20 October 2026

2 Refined Mapping of Mythic Construals to Relational Ontology Categories

1. Mesopotamian Myth (Enuma Elish, Gilgamesh, etc.)

  • System as theory of instance → The primordial waters (Apsu, Tiamat) as structured potentials, containing all possible order and chaos.

  • Instantiation / cut → The slaying of Tiamat by Marduk: the decisive cut that turns potential into a differentiated cosmos.

  • Construal → Myth itself narrates construal as alignment: naming Tiamat’s body parts as sky, land, rivers. Construal is creation.

  • Phenomenon / first-order meaning → Natural features (mountains, storms) are construed as gods, i.e. phenomena are inseparable from meaning.

  • Metaphenomena / second-order → Genealogies of gods, stories of battles, encode reflection on order itself — how meaning stabilises or collapses.

  • Alignment → Kingship and temple ritual anchor cosmic order in social practice. The king is the alignment-point of cosmos and polity.


2. Egyptian Myth (Osiris, Ra, cyclical rebirth)

  • System as theory of instance → Ma’at (order, balance, truth) as a principle of systemic potential. The cosmos is always capable of returning to balance.

  • Instantiation / cut → Ra’s daily journey through the underworld; Osiris’ death and reassembly. Each cycle is a cut from potential into renewal.

  • Construal → Ritual recitations construe death not as end but as passage — myth makes the cycle perceivable as truth.

  • Phenomenon → The Nile’s flood as first-order meaning: immediate phenomenon construed as divine renewal.

  • Metaphenomena → The weighing of the heart — not an event, but reflection on alignment of life to Ma’at.

  • Alignment → Pharaoh as pivot of order: his role ensures that cosmic cycles phase smoothly with social life.


3. Greek Myth (Olympian order, Prometheus, tragic cycles)

  • System as theory of instance → The pantheon itself as a system: differentiated powers (Zeus, Athena, Poseidon) as nodes in a structured possibility space.

  • Instantiation / cut → Prometheus stealing fire, Oedipus’ recognition, the Titanomachy — moments where latent tensions actualise as irreversible events.

  • Construal → Myths construe human rationality and hubris against divine order: the cosmos is intelligible but also bounded.

  • Phenomenon → Natural and human passions are gods — thunder is Zeus, wisdom is Athena — immediate experiences given first-order symbolic life.

  • Metaphenomena → Tragedy reflects on these construals themselves: humans questioning the system, dramatizing the limits of meaning.

  • Alignment → Polis life, ethics, and law: myth underwrites rational order by mapping cosmic struggles onto civic alignment.


4. Vedic / Early Hindu Myth (Rigveda, Purusha Sukta, cycles of yuga)

  • System as theory of instance → Rta (cosmic order, law) as the structured potential underpinning reality.

  • Instantiation / cut → Sacrifice of Purusha (cosmic man) yields the cut: one body instantiates cosmos, castes, and order.

  • Construal → Hymns construe the unseen (rta, brahman) through sound and ritual, making system intelligible.

  • Phenomenon → Fire (Agni), dawn, storm, rivers — construed directly as deities, carrying first-order symbolic weight.

  • Metaphenomena → Speculation on brahman and atman: reflexive construal of construal, moving toward philosophy.

  • Alignment → Ritual sacrifice sustains cosmos: society, nature, and divine order phase through performance.


5. Hebrew Myth (Genesis, covenant, prophetic tradition)

  • System as theory of instance → Yahweh as sole structuring potential, containing all possibility and law.

  • Instantiation / cut → Creation as speech-act (“Let there be…”), the covenant as decisive cut between divine potential and human history.

  • Construal → History itself is construed as meaningful event-sequence — genealogy and narrative as the fabric of meaning.

  • Phenomenon → Natural events (flood, drought, fertility) are construed as direct signs of divine will.

  • Metaphenomena → Prophetic reflection: the law is not just event but meta-construal of order, justice, alignment.

  • Alignment → Covenant community as cosmic anchor: alignment is moral-ethical rather than cyclical or genealogical.


This refinement shows how each mythic system foregrounds different categories: Mesopotamia stresses the fragility of instantiation, Egypt the cyclical alignment of cosmos and polity, Greece the system-instance dynamic of order vs hubris, Vedic myth the sacrificial cut and reflexivity, Hebrew myth the covenantal alignment and historical construal.

No comments:

Post a Comment