Toward a Systemic Functional Mythology

In considering myth through the lens of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), we can begin to map mythological structures onto a framework that allows us to understand how myths function semiotically in shaping human consciousness and experience. This perspective offers a way of describing myths not merely as narratives or cultural products, but as systems of meaning that operate on multiple levels of interpretation.

Myth and Semiotic Systems:

In SFL, meaning is seen as the result of interactions between three broad metafunctions:

• Ideational: Concerned with the construction of experience (what is happening).

• Interpersonal: Concerned with relationships between participants (who is involved, what roles do they play).

• Textual: Concerned with the organisation of the discourse (how meaning is structured and conveyed).

When we apply these metafunctions to myth, we can analyse how myths structure human experience and mediate relationships between individuals, communities, and the cosmos. This functional perspective allows us to break down myths into their semiotic components and understand how they serve both individual and collective needs.

The Ideational Function of Myth:

Myth, through the ideational function, allows for the construction of reality. This is the mythic worldview: the ideational component of mythology provides symbolic representations of experiences, often encompassing the entire range of human experiences—birth, death, love, war, etc. Myths offer ways of conceptualising abstract ideas about the world, about our place in the cosmos, and about the journey of life.

• Examples: The hero's journey in myth often represents the passage through life’s stages, from innocence to experience, from separation to integration. These ideational elements represent processes of transformation—a key feature of mythology.

• Metaphysical Meaning: Myths often encapsulate cosmological insights about the universe. Creation myths, for instance, serve as symbolic representations of the origins of existence and the relationship between order and chaos. These myths convey ideas about why we are here, where we came from, and where we are going.

The Interpersonal Function of Myth:

In the interpersonal function, myth plays a vital role in defining relationships—not just between people, but between humans and their environments, their ancestors, and their gods. Myths are a way for societies to negotiate roles and responsibilities within a larger order of being. Myths are often constructed in terms of heroic archetypes, where the protagonist engages with divine or natural forces, learns life lessons, and ultimately transforms.

• Role of the Hero: The hero in myth is often a symbol of the individual’s potential, reflecting the human capacity for growth, struggle, and self-overcoming. The interpersonal relationships between the hero, mentors, companions, and adversaries reflect the dynamics of personal development.

• Cultural and Social Integration: Myths serve to integrate individuals into larger social systems, such as kinship, religion, and community. For example, rite-of-passage myths guide individuals through critical life stages, such as birth, puberty, marriage, and death, serving as rituals that reinforce communal norms and values.

The Textual Function of Myth:

The textual function of myth involves how myths are structured and organised. Myths are not random stories; they have specific patterns, which can be studied and mapped. These patterns often reflect underlying archetypes—universal symbols and motifs that recur across cultures and time periods. The structural aspect of myth allows it to be passed down, preserved, and recontextualised in different environments.

• Narrative Structures: Myths typically follow certain narrative arcs, such as separation, initiation, and return, which form the backbone of the hero's journey. This pattern is recurrent in cultures across the world, suggesting a shared understanding of the transformational nature of human life.

• Symbolic Systems: Myths are composed of symbolic systems that are dense with meaning. The use of symbols such as the tree, the river, the mountain, or the snake, among others, can be traced to common symbolic conventions that convey deep metaphysical truths. This textual aspect allows myth to be interpreted on multiple levels, making it relevant across time and cultures.

---

Towards a Comprehensive Systemic Functional Mythology

The idea of a Systemic Functional Mythology is not simply to understand myth in terms of its cultural function but to approach it as a complex semiotic system that reveals how humans construct meaning, navigate life, and deal with the mysteries of existence. Myths are not static; they evolve with the semiotic system of the society that produces them.

• Myths as Semiotic Resources: Myths offer cognitive resources for individuals and societies. They provide ways of framing experience, generating meaning, and facilitating existential coherence. This perspective allows us to see mythology not just as a relic of the past, but as an ongoing tool for meaning-making.

• Myth as a Generative System: Just as in language, mythology can be viewed as a generative system that offers symbolic templates for individuals to shape their lives. The symbolic code of mythology—whether it be the archetype of the hero, the trickster, or the divine father—allows individuals to create new meanings by drawing upon these established motifs.

---

This systemic functional approach to myth offers a profound way to engage with mythology—not merely as a collection of stories but as a dynamic, multi-layered semiotic system that reflects both individual and collective human experience.