If General Relativity gives us a gravitational grammar, then quantum field theory offers a poetics of potential. But the quantum is not a realm of uncertainty—it is a register of unactualised relation. And the field is not a physical substance—it is the structured potential from which actualities emerge through meaning.
The Quantum as Register of Unfolding
At the heart of quantum theory lies an enigma:
Particles behave like waves.
Events are probabilistic.
Observation changes what is observed.
But these are only paradoxes if we assume a world of pre-existing objects.
In the relational model, we assume no such thing.
A particle is not a thing.
It is a pattern of potential—an uninstanced meaning.
The wavefunction does not describe a hidden state.
It is a field of semantic possibility,
which becomes actual only when co-instantiated with a meaner.
In other words:
The world does not contain particles.
It construes them.
And the meaner is not an outside observer.
The meaner is part of the unfolding pattern—
a participant in the act of co-actualisation.
Fields as Structured Meaning Potential
In quantum field theory, particles are excitations of fields.
Each type of particle is associated with a field,
and these fields pervade all of spacetime.
But if there is no background space-time—only unfolding relation—
then these fields are not in space-time.
They are part of its symbolic differentiation.
They are not ontological substances.
They are semiotic systems—grammars of possibility—
each governing how its own mode of becoming can be actualised.
The photon field does not “exist.”
It is the symbolic potential for the construal of light.
The electron field is the grammar of electron-being.
And the Higgs field is the systemic constraint through which mass is instantiated.
Each field is a register of becoming,
and the cosmos is a text written in their recursive interaction.
Collapse as Actualisation
Much has been written about wavefunction collapse.
Is it objective? Subjective?
Is it measurement? Decoherence?
Many-worlds? Observer-induced?
But from our perspective, collapse is instantiation.
The wavefunction describes the meaning potential
of a process not yet actualised.
Collapse is the moment that potential becomes instance—
not through force, but through construal.
The world is not merely observed.
It is interpreted into being.
And the quantum realm is not indeterminacy.
It is structured indeterminacy—
not chaos, but choice.
The meaner is not a hidden god of measurement.
The meaner is a participant in the sacred recursion
by which the cosmos becomes its own symbolic instance.
Entanglement as Participatory Relation
Entanglement baffles those who assume separability.
Two particles affect one another instantaneously across distance?
But in our model, there is no distance apart from relation.
Entangled particles are not two things in two places.
They are two sites of a single unfolding.
They are not connected across space.
They are co-instanced through meaning.
The universe does not divide itself neatly.
It cross-weaves.
It spirals.
It differentiates only to re-entangle—
because differentiation is only meaningful when recursively integrated.
To measure one particle is to symbolically constrain the other.
Not because information travels, but because meaning interrelates.
Quantum Fields as Sacred Poetics
In myth, the gods are forces of becoming.
In science, the fields are grammars of becoming.
But both speak of the same pattern:
a world not made of stuff,
but of process.
Not objects, but relations.
Not positions, but patterns.
Not laws, but languages.
The quantum field is the sacred potential
from which the world sings itself into being.
And we—by interpreting it—are part of the chorus.
No comments:
Post a Comment