15 November 2025

✦ The Sacred Ordinary

Myth Between the Worlds


“The sacred does not exist apart from the world—it is the world, seen symbolically.”


๐Ÿ  The Myth Hidden in the Everyday

We are often taught to divide the world into two domains: the sacred and the secular. One for temples, one for supermarkets. One for gods, one for calendars. But this division is itself a modern myth—and it obscures the truth at the heart of relational being: that the sacred is never elsewhere. It is always here, always now, always unfolding.

The sacred is not confined to ceremony, scripture, or celestial realms. It pulses through the washing of dishes, the holding of hands, the naming of days. It is not separate from the ordinary—it is what renders the ordinary meaningful. The sacred is the symbolic mode of participation in relational life.


๐Ÿ•ฏ️ Myth Lives in Meaning-Making

Myth is not confined to ancient texts or tribal chants. It is the living act of world-creation through meaning. Every time we interpret, ritualise, mark time, or tell stories—we are participating in the mythic.

The act of lighting a candle, pausing in silence, celebrating a birthday, or even sitting at a kitchen table with a loved one—these are not “merely” mundane. They are mythic acts of relation. They signify. They gather time and space into meaning. They echo the sacred structure of myth: initiation, transformation, return.

In this sense, every day is mythic. Every life is a sacred drama.


๐ŸŒ† The Blended Cosmos

In a relational ontology, there is no absolute line between sacred and secular. The cosmos is a symbolic whole. Its meaning arises through relation—between humans, between selves, between the visible and the invisible.

This means that the world itself is a kind of temple, though not one built of stone or ruled by dogma. It is a relational sanctuary, where meaning emerges not from distance but from nearness, from shared acts of attention. Sacredness is not an object—it is a quality of relation.

We don’t visit the sacred.
We cultivate it—through presence, care, and symbol.


Symbol as Threshold

The symbolic is the bridge between worlds. When we step into a symbol—whether a dream, a ritual, or a metaphor—we cross from the factual into the relational. Symbols open up the field where finite form meets infinite potential.

This is why everyday acts can hold mythic depth. To say grace before a meal is not about doctrine—it is an act of reverent relation. It says: this moment matters. It brings the sacred into the rhythm of the ordinary.

Myth is not “above” life. It is what life becomes when we see through symbol.


๐ŸŒฟ The Practice of Mythic Living

To live mythically is not to flee the secular world—it is to transform it. Not through belief, but through symbolic participation. This is a practice of perception. It means seeing the divine not in the heavens, but in the face across from us. Not in doctrine, but in dialogue. Not in temples, but in tea shared.

This is not a fantasy—it is a deepened realism. It recognises that all meaning is relational, and that the sacred arises wherever we give ourselves symbolically to the moment.

We are not split between worlds.
We are always between worlds.
And in that between, meaning flowers.

No comments:

Post a Comment