Campbell's Four Functions Of Myth Reframed In Light Of A Relational Cosmology

1. The Cosmological Function

Campbell argues that one of the primary functions of myth is to explain the structure of the cosmos, often portraying the universe's creation or the principles that govern its operation. This is traditionally seen in mythologies that attempt to explain the origin of the world, the forces that drive it, and how human beings fit into the broader cosmological picture.

Reinterpreted in A Relational Cosmos:

In a relational cosmos, the cosmological function of myth can be re-framed as a participatory memory of how potential becomes actual. The mythic narrative doesn’t just describe the origin of the cosmos in an objective sense; it tells us how we construe the cosmos as meaningful, and how this construal unfolds through individual and collective acts of instantiation.

For example, Genesis’s creation story isn’t simply about how the universe came to be in a material sense, but about how the act of naming — “Let there be” — creates a pattern of meaning that becomes the fabric of our understanding of the world. The cosmos isn’t just out there—it’s re-instantiated with every telling of the myth, and in every act of construal that seeks to make sense of it.

2. The Sociological Function

Myths also serve to maintain the social order by providing a framework for how individuals should behave, often outlining roles, duties, and relationships within society. This function can be seen in myths that address moral laws, community customs, and the consequences of deviant behavior.

Reinterpreted in a Relational Cosmos:

In a relational cosmology, the sociological function of myth is an exploration of individuation within a collective system. Myths show us how a group positions itself in relation to the field of potential. They embody the social negotiations of meaning — how a community defines itself, its boundaries, and its roles in relation to the broader cosmos.

Take, for instance, the myth of Cain and Abel. It’s not just about two brothers fighting over a sacrifice. It’s a story about how social roles and identities are shaped through construal, how one’s act of individuation within a collective system has consequences. Cain's act of individuating through his jealousy and violence sets the stage for social fragmentation. This story teaches us how individuals position themselves within the field of collective potential and the tension that arises when that positioning goes against the grain of collective values.

3. The Pedagogical Function

Campbell describes the pedagogical function of myth as its role in teaching individuals how to live and behave within the context of the world. Myths often offer moral lessons, guidance on growing up, navigating relationships, and understanding the world.

Reinterpreted in a Relational Cosmos:

In our model, the pedagogical function of myth teaches us the grammar of meaning-making—how meaning is instantiated and personalised. Myths offer a map of how potential is transformed into actual meaning, showing us the ways in which we can participate in construal and how we can shape our own meaning within the world.

For instance, the myth of the hero’s journey offers a pedagogical map for individuation. It teaches us that to fully realise our potential, we must confront and integrate the various parts of ourselves (the shadow, the trickster, etc.). This can be seen as the myth's way of teaching us how to traverse the space between potential (the unknown) and instantiation (the realised self). It offers a semiotic grammar that we can apply to our own lives, showing us the possible paths from potential to meaningful actualisation.

4. The Mystical Function

Finally, Campbell sees the mystical function of myth as its role in reconnecting the individual with the sacred, the transcendent, or the divine. Myths have the power to take us beyond the material world, offering a glimpse into a greater, more profound reality.

Reinterpreted in Our Relational Cosmos:

In the context of a relational cosmos, the mystical function of myth takes on an even deeper meaning. It is the ultimate act of participation in the cosmos as meaning-making. To participate in a myth is to instantiate potential in the present moment — to align oneself with the unfolding of meaning. This function of myth is where the cosmos and the individual meet in a deeply participatory relationship, where the act of construal is not just intellectual, but existential.

Myths like the story of the dying god (e.g., Osiris, Christ) might represent a return to the ground of being itself. These stories invite us to experience the sacred process of death and rebirth—not as a theological doctrine, but as a semiotic process of meaning that is continually renewed. The myth of resurrection is a myth of reinstantiation—of potential re-emerging in new forms. In this sense, the mystical function brings us back into a direct relationship with the cosmos, not as passive observers, but as active participants in the creation of meaning itself.

---

Conclusion

By reframing Campbell's Four Functions of Myth in light of instantiation and individuation, we’ve reimagined myth not as a static repository of ancient wisdom, but as a living, participatory process—a memory of meaning-making that continues to unfold.

• Myths teach us how meaning emerges.

• They show us how we individuate within the larger system of potential.

• They offer us a grammar of meaning for navigating our lives and the cosmos.

• They reconnect us with the relational process that is the very fabric of reality.

Myth is no longer the passive description of the world, but the active construal of it.